Supreme Court Notebook: The Justices Have Not Yet Decided Cases | NASCAR Racing News

By this point, they’ve always decided on at least one case, usually a handful, according to Adam Feldman, founder of the Empirical SCOTUS blog.

But fall turned into winter with no resolutions made, and not even a three-week vacation yielded any published opinions.

The next opportunity is on Monday, before the judges take another break of about four weeks.

While their opinions were not prolific, the justices’ cross-examination of the attorneys was vigorous, with Jackson The most liquid liquid In court arguments, Feldman found.

“If the volume of speech correlates with the amount of writing we will find in her opinions and the opinions she signs off on, it may also slow the pace,” Feldman wrote on Twitter.

The split between the six conservative justices and the three liberal justices appears frequently in decisions. The final season produced more 6-3 results than unanimous decisions, which typically make up the largest share, according to statistics compiled by Scotusblog.

Cases in which more than one judge writes an opinion, whether dissenting or concurring, take longer than those in which the court is unanimous.

In 2018, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered the court’s first opinion on November 6, in a case that had been argued 36 days earlier. “Rapid Ruth,” as Ginsburg jokingly called herself, was the quickest clerk on the court. Matt Ginsburg in 2020.

Last year, less than 30% of decisions were unanimous, and it is assumed that some cases of this term will lead to the same result.

This is where it was in early May Judge Samuel Alito’s draft opinion leaked in the event of an abortion. It is possible, and perhaps also likely, that justices may have changed some of their internal practices to reduce the chances of opinion leaking out. Any changes may extend the time needed to finalize a decision.

The court said nothing about the status of the investigation into the leak, which was ordered by Chief Justice John Roberts. The Wall Street Journal recently reported that the court had brought in outside government investigators who helped narrow down potential suspects by early summer. But the perpetrator was not apparently identified.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor is the latest of the nine members of the nation’s highest court to comment on the June ruling that struck down nearly half a century of abortion rights.

Sotomayor was responding to a simple question from Berkeley Law School dean Erwin Chemerinsky, who moderated an event with Justice for the American Association of Law Schools. After gross final chapter decisions, Chemerinsky asked, “How are you?”

Sotomayor appeared to focus on just one of the big conservative-driven issues, which also included expanding gun and religious rights and curtailing the Biden administration’s efforts to combat climate change. Sotomayor defected in all of these cases.

“If you were asking how this grave decision affected me,” Sotomayor said, “the description of my words would have been different from day to day. Sometimes I was shocked. Other times I was deeply saddened. Many times I had a sense of hopelessness about the direction she was going.” my court.”

But in the end, she felt she had no choice but to persevere. “However, I realized that one does not have the option to fall prey to despair, and that I have to get up and keep fighting,” she said.

The event took place in early January, and the association posted a video online last week.

Other justices have spoken of damage to the court they believe has resulted from the leak. Justice Elena Kagan spoke several times over the summer and fall about the dangers of viewing the Court as a political body.

Sotomayor almost showed up for a law school association event, but was among the court’s most frequent travelers before the coronavirus pandemic changed everything.

Then only Judge Antonin Scalia who He passed away in 2016Her competition is getting out of Washington, she said.

Judges are supposed to report their travel when someone else pays the bill in an annual statement released to the public.

But Fix the Court, a watchdog group, found holes in the reporting on Sotomayor and other justices.

On Tuesday, the group sued the Justice Department under the federal Freedom of Information Act for records related to the judges’ travel. The US Marshals Service, part of the Department of Justice, regularly provides security when justices leave town.

Fix the Court is seeking records from 2018 to 2022. Two previous lawsuits and requests for information under state public records laws resulted in trips not reported by the judges and additional details of some of the trips taken.

In 2016, Sotomayor took six trips paid for by public universities which she initially omitted. It finally updated its report for that year.