The SF art gallery owner from Khartoum Video must face consequences

Let’s face it: A lot of people in San Francisco feel comfortable harassing, harassing, and bullying people who live on the street. The fact that the San Francisco Police Department has confiscated congestive heart failure medications, prosthetics, and all other worldly possessions, Crush them in garbage compactorsDefinitely not setting a good example.

Distinguishing himself from this wilderness background is Collier Gwen, owner of the Foster Gwen Gallery near Chinatown. And on Monday, a video posted to Twitter showed Gwen The face of an apparently uninhabited woman sprayed water hose amid a series of winter storms President Joe Biden announced case of emergency. If there were no dire consequences for this level of antisocial cruelty, this city could not be saved. If Gwen had shown even a semblance of remorse, one could make an argument for moving on. But his statements after the fact make it clear that he is unable to hold accountable his act of cruelty.

“No one can go into their stores or their offices. And so, you know, if she gets wet while that’s happening, it’s because she got wet in there,” Gowen said in an interview. with sfgate.

“So am I sorry? I’m only sorry that… my way of helping her countless times hasn’t gotten any done,” Gwen said. San Francisco Chronicle, standing swaddled in what appears to be no less than $300 worth of outerwear. (The Chronicle and SFGATE are both owned by Hearst but have separate newsrooms.)

The reaction online was immediate. The Foster Gwen Gallery has a one-star rating on Yelp as of Thursday. Allegedly, the entrance glass door smash. But there are still more serious consequences that must be delivered to send a strong message that this deeply disruptive behavior is totally unacceptable.

To be clear, the kind of violence Gwen used against this woman should not be recreated under any circumstances. However, what should be equally clear is that as long as Gwen remains unrepentant and disrespectful to his neighbors, he will continue to be a threat to them.

Decisions as to whether his conduct constitutes a criminal offense should be seriously scrutinized by those qualified to make that determination, such as the police (who are still investigating the accident) and District Attorney Brock Jenkins. Likewise, members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, including Chairman Aaron Peskin, who He strongly condemns Gwen’s actionsHe should consider whether there are any punitive steps they can take against his work, such as revoking business licenses or other permits. If Gwen rents the place, the landlord must look for different tenants. Members of the public should either obtain their Abstract Expressionist art and antique Italian furniture elsewhere or actively choose to exhibit.

Doing so is not “cancel culture”. If Gwen takes responsibility for his actions, portraying the incident as a citizen — frustrated by the severity of the city’s homelessness crisis — who better let their emotions get the better of them might hit them with more water. His lack of remorse makes it clear that this is not the case, as much as some people would like it to be.

Failed mayoral candidate, Chesa Bowden, summons leader and serial city council president Richie Greenberg chirp That Gwen and “tax-burdened San Francisco residents and business owners” were the real victims of the crash — not the woman who complied with police orders to move. More than 100 commentators agreed that the proceedings were unfortunate but that they were the result of a man being pushed to an end by someone who refused services when offered.

Gwen said in a message Interview with KGO-TV.

“But, I find it hard to apologize when we didn’t get to help the situation by taking her to some sort of psychological help or evaluation.”



The parade of people who bend over backwards to explain Gwen’s cruelty sets the stage for more cruelty by portraying all homeless people as simply resisting help and reason. Aside from having perfectly rational explanations for refusing social services (unacceptable rules about property or pets, fear of a gathering place, logistical concerns), the argument that frustration can justify such behavior can be refuted by a middle school student. If Gwen really couldn’t see a homeless person outside of his work, he probably wasn’t isolated to living in a city or country with deep systemic inequality. If this is how he handles frustration, we might all be better off with a smaller showroom.

While Gwen’s behavior was particularly disgusting, it was not so different from the daily harassment faced by people living on the streets of San Francisco. Whether from a network on the Internet from “Activists” Depicting homeless people who can’t agree or back down from public opinion, police conduct illegal sweeps in defiance of court orders, or guards who decide it is okay to give another human hypothermia if that person impedes their ability to sell expensive Greco-Roman tchotchkes, unhoused subjects face almost constant aggression. what makes This is amazing The remarkable incident is that it was caught on camera, not that it was out of the ordinary.

Many people are working to solve homelessness by getting help and shelter for individuals. Gwen would have joined them. Instead, he turned on the hose.

As for Greenberg, Gwen, and anyone else who is inclined to defend these actions: Gwen was not forced to do so; It was not an option of last resort. It was a deliberate coercive act committed because Gwen thought he could get away with it. It is upon us if we allow it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *